10 points by AllanSavageDev 3 days ago | 5 comments
They don’t offer any alternative method—no email verification, no manual review, nothing. It’s either:
Submit to biometric facial recognition, or
Lose access to your account (and in many cases, your professional network).
I live in the U.S. (Indiana/Texas) and looked into the legal implications. There are some laws around biometric data, but no practical way to opt out or demand alternatives.
This seems like a huge overreach for a professional networking platform. Not everyone is comfortable handing over a face scan and ID to a third-party vendor just to keep using their profile. Especially when the reason for flagging is unclear, and there's no appeal path.
Has anyone else run into this? Are other platforms doing this now too? I'd love to hear if there's any way around this or if anyone's fought it successfully.
mickelsen 17 hours ago
Companies pushing for this already have all the onboarding flows there. Big 4 and legaltech firms already lobbied for. Banks through their smaller fintech outlets, mobile service providers and pretty much any service you could externalize ID validation that used to be in person, are ramping up adoption.
They are applying it across the board to anything that allows user-generated content under your real name, to prevent impersonation/fraud. Why do they do it with other non-essential services, like social media that doesn't take payments, I'm not sure. But there's indeed regulatory pressure across the board, which will give way into more surveillance down the road.
Teddydaguru 16 hours ago
CHUCKEESH 12 hours ago
baobun 3 days ago
Yup. Did some attempts at appeal but ended up abandoning LinkedIn for good (well, I guess it was mutual). I encourage everyone to do the same.
> Are other platforms doing this now too?
Facebook also does this (lock accounts demanding govt ID).
Both LinkedIn and FB/Insta were >1y ago.
brudgers 3 days ago
LinkedIn is a business platform. Anonymity does not seem consistent with its value as such.
Anyway, Persona is going to verify your submission against what is already in its database. Which after two decades of facial recognition and fifty years of credit reports is just about everything.
But if it matters, hire a lawyer. If it doesn’t, it doesn’t.