10 points by tosh 1 week ago | 5 comments
foobahify 1 week ago
hayst4ck 1 week ago
If police and militaries disappeared overnight, then stocks would have no value. Guns would have value and food would have value. Ability to produce these things have value, but paper and whats on it has no value. Moving physical objects has value.
In war, all of these things on paper don't matter compared to physical reality and how it is crafted.
So investing creates a dependence on the American enforcement system which would not enforce in china's favor in case of a war. In some ways investing in a foreign country weakens your own sovereignty and it definitely weakens sovereignty as Putin or Xi would define it.
yo_yo_yo-yo 1 week ago
The world ought to come together in a way to collectively navigate a US-exit. That is the only solution I can see. It will not be palatable to Trump, who will probably want Europe, China, and India to become isolationist themselves.
Interesting times.
rcrsvpreordnmnt 1 week ago
nabla9 1 week ago
He may speak the truth, but he speaks only truths that Chinese communist party allows.
He made massive bet on China. Large chunk of his personal assets are now tied in China and Bridgewater is the largest foreign asset manager in China. He was able to wiggle out some of them, but he is still tied there.