115 points by darubramha 1 week ago | 59 comments
I built uncurl.dev to scratch my own itch: I kept getting curl commands in API docs, bug reports, or Slack messages and wanted a quick way to visualize, run, and debug them without firing up Postman or writing code to dissect them. It was also sometimes painful to create a test page specifically for non-tech users to consume an API. I originally vibe-coded this over a weekend just to make it easier for myself to debug API requests shared as curl commands. It slowly grew into something I found surprisingly useful in my workflow, so I decided to clean it up and share it.
uncurl.dev takes a curl command and: - Converts it into a visual representation - Lets you edit and inspect all parts of the request - Allows sharing via a unique link - (Optionally) executes it from the server, so business or non-technical users can see results
Execution is currently behind login, with a cap (5/min) to avoid abuse and manage costs. Non-logged-in users can still build and share curl commands—they just can’t execute them. The server runs each request in a Docker sandbox with strict resource/time limits (cpu, memory, timeout, no network access outside the request).
It’s not meant to replace full-featured tools like Postman or Hoppscotch. It’s more of a “CLI-to-UI bridge” for fast sharing and debugging, especially in dev workflows where curl is the starting point. Think of it like Pastebin or JSFiddle, but for curl commands.
If you’ve ever copied a curl from an API doc and wanted a cleaner way to see it or send it to someone else, I’d love your feedback.
Thanks! (You can try it without signup here: https://uncurl.dev)
ajnin 1 week ago
themanmaran 1 week ago
So I see this as similar to having a sandbox built into your docs page. Except I can customize a request and send it directly to a user. The only missing piece is the authentication part. Since I wouldn't want to embed an api key in this link.
darubramha 1 week ago
I kept finding myself sending curl requests in Slack or email, and it felt clunky—especially when non-devs or support teams needed to test something quickly. uncurl.dev started as a way to make that share-and-execute process more visual and frictionless.
For the auth part—embedding API keys in payload is a no-go in most cases. For now, sending out auth headers separately for them to fill in themselves is what I did within my workplace.
I'm exploring a couple of ideas to help with this:
Team-scoped secrets: For logged-in users or teams, saving common auth headers that aren’t part of the shared link.
One-time, encrypted secrets: The link works once and destroys the sensitive payload after execution.
aae42 1 week ago
TheDong 1 week ago
ultrafez 1 week ago
markerz 1 week ago
I also think it's weird to be so willing to let people run arbitrary CURL commands from your platform, without any billing or account verification. It feels ripe for abuse.
jasir 1 week ago
[0]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Guides/COR...
darubramha 1 week ago
CORS was a blocker for client side requests, I have a separate branch where this is integrated, maybe will add it alongside server side execution to let the person creating the curl decide whether they can execute on browser or server side.
markerz 1 week ago
mzronek 1 week ago
reassess_blind 1 week ago
darubramha 1 week ago
Really appreciate you taking the time to look and let me know (even if it had to be in public). I have added a github repo for filing bugs (https://github.com/uncurl/uncurl-support) in the docs page :)
treesknees 1 week ago
xrisk 1 week ago
treesknees 1 week ago
We use libcurl and pycurl where it makes sense. This rule for cli options extends to other binaries as well, some that don’t offer libraries like curl does (think closed source firmware tools or ancient homegrown cli tools.)
markerz 1 week ago
notpushkin 1 week ago
trollied 1 week ago
darubramha 1 week ago
Security is a top priority for this project, and I'm actively working to tighten things up. This initial version was launched to validate the concept, and admittedly, there were oversights (including an unauthenticated DELETE endpoint that was highlighted).
If you're open to it, I'd love to learn more about what you'd want to see from a security standpoint in a tool like this. I'm building in public and happy to be corrected where needed.
Thanks again for keeping things real.