622 points by TheTaytay 5 days ago | 141 comments
unshavedyak 5 days ago
I hate when i see fun side projects that cost the same as full subscriptions to other products. There's only a handful of $15/m services i "want" in my life.. it really raises the barrier to entry when i'm so aware and averse to subscription costs.
Yet $2/m? Instantly sold on that price. It's a fun price, it looks like a fun product, it lines up perfectly for me. It's silly that the price has me almost more interested than the product. Love it
Thanks for this, i plan to try it out!
unshavedyak 5 days ago
Any thoughts on how the review will happen when that barrier is reached?
wongarsu 5 days ago
shishcat 5 days ago
qudat 5 days ago
wongarsu 5 days ago
nathants 5 days ago
iambrandonm 5 days ago
Really glad to see more projects like pico.sh embracing low cost, no frills, indie services. https://99.dev
ryao 5 days ago
blatantly 5 days ago
qudat 4 days ago
Further, we are mostly targeting individual/small teams who want to rapidly prototype on the web. We provide enough convenience features (e.g. zero-install, multi-region, site analytics, tunnel connect/disconnect notifications, easy script automation) to entice users to keep their prototypes running in "prod" as long as possible before they feel the need to provision their own VPS.
We could go upstream and try to target larger teams/companies, but honestly, this is just fun for us to do on the side.
We don't make any guarantees about uptime at this point but we take it very seriously (we have alerting and respond quickly) and treat it like our day-jobs (I work at a paas and antonio is a platform engineer wizard).
unshavedyak 4 days ago
blatantly 4 days ago
unshavedyak 3 days ago
Am i being too generous?
TheTaytay 5 days ago
And the two authors, qudat, and antoniomima are active on HN, as their responsive comments here demonstrate. Just good work all around.
qudat 5 days ago
Happy to answer any questions!
LelouBil 5 days ago
I noticed this mention here [0]:
Because in our Go SSH server we re-implement rsync, many options are currently not supported. For example, --delete and --dry-run are not supported.
But on your front page it says : Upload your static site to us:
rsync --delete -rv ./public/ pgs.sh:/mysite/
So do you support delete ? One of these pages is outdated or did I miss something ?antoniomika 5 days ago
cfebs 5 days ago
A ssh or TUI frontend for some git/forge host like: https://forgejo.org/ would be pretty cool!
vhodges 4 days ago
WinstonSmith84 4 days ago
antoniomika 4 days ago
WinstonSmith84 3 days ago
customdomain.example.com. 300 IN CNAME tuns.sh.
_sish.customdomain.example.com 300 IN TXT "SHA256:mVPw"
What I want to do is:
1- to create a custom domain ON tuns.sh (or another Pico service)
2- redirect this custom domain to another DNS (such as a Load Balancer, an API Gateway, etc.)
Something like: {username}-{proj}.tuns.sh. 300 IN CNAME myalb-123abc.amazonaws.com.
memset 5 days ago
Would you be willing to share how it’s doing on the business side? Hints on how you’ve grown users or how many folks are willing to subscribe?
I’d love to build a service (in a different domain) that operates as simply as this.
qudat 4 days ago
Yes, absolutely. Here's our year-end-review where we talk numbers: https://blog.pico.sh/status-011
Ultimately, what keeps us going is we want these services to exist for our own side-project development and it's an extra boost of motivation when others use our services.
All of our marketing is through HN/lobsters/reddit since that's our target demo.
jwr 5 days ago
I run a B2B SaaS. Support costs is what eats you alive: in case of a complex B2B app anything below $40/month is unsustainable. This is of course better for simpler apps/services, but even there you have to be super careful.
qudat 4 days ago
In terms of the costs to run a saas, we are actively monitoring hardware utilization and resource allocation. Antonio and I have a lot of experience building and running saas (and paas) products so we feel confident we can manage whatever usage comes our way. We have also been strategic in terms of the services we provide in an effort to keep service support manageable.
jimbosis 5 days ago
It does also mention there is a $0 "Starter" tier.
(I found that link on this page:
EDIT: Mention the Starter tier.
cookiemonsieur 5 days ago
I agree to an extent. But it largely depends on the complexity of your offering. If all you do is expose flat data through an API, you can maybe get away with an API Gateway x Lambda x DynamoDB combo, which would cost virtually nothing as the free tier is very generous.
Just my 2c.
jwr 4 days ago
Especially with B2B, it's easy to underestimate the support load for non-technical issues.
cookiemonsieur 4 days ago
How does that factor into the $40/month price point ?
lionkor 5 days ago
conductr 4 days ago
Back in early 2000s I ran a shared webhosting business, most customer's were savvy at the time and it was kind of a "you're on your own, let me know if the infra is acting up" type arrangement. I ran it with about 2000 customers for a year or so solo and only got about 2 support emails a day. Back then, 24-72 hour response was acceptable so I never needed to be a 24/7 resource.
jwr 4 days ago
Similarly, if you think 1000 B2B SaaS subscriptions is an easy-to-achieve number, I'd wager a bet you haven't run a B2B SaaS business.
Roughly, the calculation is: at $40/month, a single subscription brings in $480/year. That means you can safely afford to spend roughly one hour of support on a subscription PER YEAR. If you spend more than 2h, you are definitely in the red. And you will get support requests, of all kinds: the ones you expect, and then all the stuff about lost passwords, inability to log in, network problems, lost invoices, requests to change the billing period, requests for invoices from last year for a customer that has since canceled and been deleted, data export/import, etc.
People who haven't run a business routinely underestimate the costs of running a business and imagine that these numbers mean that business owners are buying yachts and private jets. People who have run a business realize that it's much more difficult to make ends meet than it seems.
blatantly 5 days ago