48 points by superkuh 3 days ago | 31 comments
xeromal 2 days ago
int_19h 2 days ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FGC-9
(The law is still silly, but for other reasons.)
magic_smoke_ee 2 days ago
An iffy 3d-printed gun using crappy materials can technically work for a few hundred rounds doesn't mean much in a country full of lots of legal guns of all sorts. And while I don't want TdA mass-producing RPGs, but that's not a problem solvable by regulating milling machines.
The problem is some people want total, invasive, inconsistent control over what other people can do, make, and be for ideological reasons rather than rational ones.
adriancr 2 days ago
It's not fully 3d printed. 3d printed parts are fragile.
So what exactly are they banning?
Why not ban the electrochemical machining instead?
imtringued 2 days ago
unethical_ban 2 days ago
Dig1t 2 days ago
A good site to find and share designs is https://ctrlpew.com
EA-3167 22 hours ago
I'm pretty sure the average SUV can do more damage than the average 3D printed firearm.
verdverm 2 days ago
The any components of a firearm phrase seems the one that makes this opaque to what printers will be covered. One could see this apply to all printers depending on who you classify part
fakedang 2 days ago
It's like being stupid is a requirement to get elected to the NY Senate.
c22 2 days ago
magic_smoke_ee 2 days ago
sevensor 2 days ago