Even Google is plagued by spam, I've tried all sorts of search techniques and alternative engines but I feel like the only solution seems to be doing things manually. I was already starting to block things by myself but I thought it'd be more productive to make the list public and try crowdsourcing. Even now, searching "how to partition a hard disk" would often drive you to low-effort sites telling you to use their software.

> Unfortunately, this kind of blocklist is highly subjective. This list blocks MSN.com! That's hardly what I would have chosen.

It's definitely a bit opinionated, but it's open to discussion - you can create an unblock request issue (if you care enough to do so, of course!). The reason I blocked MSN is that it just re-hosts articles from other websites, so I'd rather see the official source than be tricked into Microsoft's site which is very annoying, like how it opens another article if you scroll too fast down.

Afaik DDG is just Bing, whereas Kagi is using Google, Bing, (Yandex?) among others - https://help.kagi.com/kagi/search-details/search-sources.htm...

As a Kagi user I actually haven’t encountered much search result spam, surprised you’re seeing enough there to drive you back to Google!

> Unfortunately, this kind of blocklist is highly subjective. This list blocks MSN.com! That's hardly what I would have chosen.

I'm wondering how much the blacklist can be broken down into categories of spam. Sponsorblock for YouTube has a lot options around the types of things it'll skip through and the user has choice in how they're handled (skipped automatically, prompted to skip, simply highlighted in the scrubbar) at the category level.

I get tons when looking up recipes and cooking related information. Things that will say "X can be refrigerated for up to two weeks" then in the next paragraph "X is fine to refrigerate and eat for 2-3 days" or similar.

I'd block them but there seem to be infinite. They're probably buying 10+ character domains using random words/names/phrases in bulk.

Yes and no.

Power-law relations mean that a small number of domains will account for the lion's share of low-relevance results, and filtering those out will result in dramatic improvements in relevance.

That small set is probably fairly dynamic, however, and will likely change at a fairly high rate over time.

Penny-ante sites are less likely to appear in generic results, but might well be whatever the spam/phish term is for junk general Web search results.

We may well come to rely more on whitelisting, but I think at least for now that's not necessary, largely due to the dynamics of publishing / attention economies themselves.

This. I think, well curated web directories (by humans and machines) deserve a comeback.

You could get a step closer to that and integrate it into your DNS: https://github.com/StevenBlack/hosts

The upside is that it would go beyond your browser to anything on your machine that makes a DNS request.

> Another great function (not for this plugin) should be the option to "bundle" all search results from the same domain. Stuff them under one collapsible entry.

That would be really cool. Just zip it up if you don't want to see that domain for that specific search.

I think this would block you from visiting the websites, but they'd still show up on search results. uBlacklist doesn't block them, but rather just hides them for search engines which IMO is a better approach.