244 points by freediver 1 week ago | 115 comments
WoodenChair 1 week ago
A quick tip: be sure to reset the PRAM with command-alt-p-r holding down during restart until you hear 3 chimes. Then while the machine is booting hold down command-alt-o-f and type "reset-nvram" and then "set-defaults" and then "reset-all" (all of this is in open firmware) before installing Mac OS 9 to make sure firmware is in its original state.
I came across this idea of SSD upgrading and installing Mac OS 9 in April 2024 and bought three broken ones to build one for my son. [0] When the first one worked, I ended up figuring, why not just finish the other two and sell them on eBay?
That led me into a hobby business. I've now cleaned, upgraded with SSDs, and sold about 70 of them. The "business" basically breaks even, so it truly is a hobby. In fact I invested so much in inventory buying 90 of them in a lot at the end of 2024 that I am negative right now. I will probably turn a slight profit in 2025. But it's fun and if you want you can buy one from me at: https://os9.shop
Sorry for the self-promotion, but very relevant!
piltdownman 6 days ago
I nearly considered something like this a few years back but the domestic market was way too small to consider. Fair play for the labour of love.
WoodenChair 6 days ago
mistyvales 7 days ago
WoodenChair 7 days ago
https://macos9lives.com/smforum/index.php?topic=7048.0
If you are concerned get a 1.25 or 1.42. The 32 MB of VRAM difference (the 1.5 has 64 MB of VRAM while the 1.42 has 32 MB) will not make a difference for almost any Mac OS 9 game. But yes, if you want the ultimate in terms of GHz and VRAM go for the 1.5. In some late '90s and early '00s FPS games it could be a benefit.
gabriel-uribe 7 days ago
WoodenChair 7 days ago
duffyjp 6 days ago
I ran 10.4 and Void (no longer maintained) so if there's a technical reason to stay on mSATA for Mac OS 9 please ignore. ;)
WoodenChair 6 days ago
duffyjp 2 days ago
2 Pack M.2 NGFF SATA SSD to 2.5 inch IDE 44PIN Converter Adapter with Case Unit price $17.98
I did a Mac Mini and also a Powerbook G4. They work great in both.
johnklos 1 week ago
I'm still using Mac mini G4s in several places, both for Mac OS X (legacy Final Chop) and as small, low power servers running NetBSD.
There are really only two drawbacks to the Mac mini G4, in my opinion:
Gigabit ethernet would've been a dollar or two more? Being stuck with 100 Mbps, or around 300 Mbps if one uses a gigabit USB adapter, isn't fun.
If the DIMM slot could take 2 gig DIMMs, this'd be a perfect machine. Other PowerPC Macs could take 2 gigs - heck, even the older PowerPC 604e Power Macs 9500 and 9600 could take 1.5 gigs - so being limited to 1 gig is a bit unfortunate, especially considering that 2 gig DDR DIMMs are a thing (later Xserve G5 units could take 2 gig DDR DIMMs).
Still, the Mac mini G4 is the only computer aside from SBCs that I've bought brand new, and I have always been very happy with my decision.
rollcat 1 week ago
[1]: https://www.rollc.at/posts/2024-07-02-tibook/
I'm not sure if it can be made to run m68k apps "natively", but on the other hand you can emulate just about any classic MacOS in a modern browser[2].
Fnoord 6 days ago
bombcar 6 days ago
thepryz 1 week ago
freediver 1 week ago
tonyedgecombe 1 week ago
Terretta 6 days ago
// But now turned off and reboxed along with an Apple //c, SE/30, the cube, the first Intel cheese grater, etc. Someday...
freediver 1 week ago
amatecha 1 week ago
crims0n 1 week ago
vimy 1 week ago