31 points by DocFeind 9 hours ago | 50 comments
zamadatix 8 hours ago
Articles around SpinLaunch seem to be popping up lately which is a bit odd considering it's been ~2 years since they've done any testing and I've haven't seen any actual new announcements in these new articles yet.
bunderbunder 8 hours ago
You're kindasorta doing the equivalent of replacing an entire Falcon 9 with a relatively lightweight sabot. Either way the initial boost puts the orbital vehicle on a suborbital trajectory, so it needs to carry its own engine for the orbital insertion burn.
zamadatix 6 hours ago
horsawlarway 8 hours ago
This seems to replace the booster stage, which is still a pretty huge deal, and is also the largest expenditure of fuel.
> Articles around SpinLaunch seem to be popping up lately which is a bit odd considering it's been ~2 years since they've done any testing and I've haven't seen any actual new announcements in these new articles yet.
No argument here. Their website also seems to be about a year out of date (their "in the news" stops in late 2023).
zamadatix 7 hours ago
Replacing the booster stage is an interesting proposal, it's just not what the title conveys.
rdtsc 8 hours ago
sbuttgereit 8 hours ago
rdtsc 5 hours ago
perihelions 7 hours ago
Looks like a liquid-fuel rocket engine? Wow. That's got to be one heck of a hydraulic hammer when it hits 10,000g.
What kind of rocket engine have they designed that could survive this? Obviously it's not going to be a conventional turbopump; those things have micron tolerances, no way those could withstand 10,000g and still work. Probably they're doing some kind of pressure-fed engine (the fuel tanks held at high pressure, probably by compressed helium). They don't seem to publicly answer these questions, anywhere on their website? That's credibility-hurting.
There've been rocket engines built in the past that can survive low 100's of g's, at least. Those were exotic solid-fuel designs, intended as air-defense missiles.
shmeeed 4 hours ago
Thanks for the Sprint info BTW, I had never heard of that.
dylan604 8 hours ago
It's also just so much less dramatic visually compared to a rocket launch. It just feels anticlimactic. Still cool and interesting none-the-less.
rbanffy 8 hours ago
bunderbunder 8 hours ago
I the 2022 test flights that the article mentions would have been from their smaller, vertical-throwing suborbital prototype. Last I saw they had kind of gone silent since 2023. The news page on their website [https://www.spinlaunch.com/in-the-news] hasn't posted any updates in almost a year.
I assume means they haven't successfully scaled up to the orbital launcher yet. Perhaps they're having trouble securing funding. Perhaps they're having trouble working out some engineering problems or securing a site for the facility. Or maybe things are just taking time. I'm guessing, though, that this is a situation where no news is definitely not good news.
karmakaze 8 hours ago