88 points by GhiGt 2 days ago | 31 comments
Ennea 2 days ago
nine_k 2 days ago
I wish Ghostty all the luck, because the current state of terminal emulators is a pretty high bar to clear.
paranoidxprod 2 days ago
Kovah 2 days ago
nine_k 2 days ago
Try opening a fullscreen terminal and cat a long file. Add search / highlighting, repeat. Type something really fast; sometimes you can even notice the input lag, especially if you enable ligatures and other features.
Install WezTerm, Kitty, Alacritty; try the same.
It's not that iTerm is not fast enough for most daily work. It's not that iTerm's feature set is not great. But there are faster alternatives, and in many cases, the difference is pronounced.
ktosobcy 2 days ago
I just opened iTerm and started bashing keys on my keyboard randomly and there wasn't any lag. For me, for all intents and purposed it just fast.
Cat a long-ish (10k lines, I know it's not that log but don't have anything longer at hand) and search with highlight and there wasn't any lag (and I'm quite alergic to it).
BUT. I don't have any fancy shell prompt nor ligatures (don't see any point) and there is a warning that enabling said ligatures will impact performance...
nine_k 2 days ago
On a slower machine, 100ms latency is achievable, which becomes perceptible (not yet annoying). Output speed can be visibility sluggish if you add too much highlighting and stuff.
I haven't touched iTerm for several years; maybe the modern versions are intrinsically faster, and modern hardware is definitely much.faster, so this could have become imperceptible.
ktosobcy 1 day ago
Nowadays I'm on MBP M1 (so already "older-ish" machine) and it works fine. I definitely notice latency when I'm connecting to a machine with ping over ~70ms so I assume that if I don't notice any delay then latency is low (?)
drcongo 2 days ago
AnonymousPlanet 2 days ago
nine_k 2 days ago
AnonymousPlanet 2 days ago