Which makes sense, if you remember that there used to not be such a thing as pre-compounded drugs. Rather, a prescription was literally a recipe a doctor would write out for you to give to your friendly neighbourhood compounding pharmacist, who would follow that recipe to produce a drug for you.

Which in turn lends an interesting clarity to the traditional roles and competencies of "medical doctors" vs "pharmacists". In the 1800s, a trained doctor was someone who would be expected to come up with a — potentially de-novo! — drug formulation, on the spot, as a treatment for a patient; and a trained pharmacist is someone who would be expected to take your prescription, walk into a lab in the back of their shop, and come out having converted that — potentially never-before-encountered — drug formulation into something you could put in your mouth. If the active ingredient was something unusual, they would even be expected to synthesize it themselves! (Which explains why we used to call pharmacists "chemists". They were!)

You can ask the processor to send higher layer information via diag, including the messages the base stations send. There’s also commands to lock on to a specific base station so you’re not constantly moving from cell to cell.

There’s plenty of commercial devices that use this functionality to provide network monitoring and management capabilities for mobile network operators checking out base station functionality in the field. TEMS comes to mind for that but they’re certainly not the only ones.

It’s a deep rabbit hole :-)

You know what they say. "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear"

So I wonder what they're trying to hide from all of us. Probably all the backdoors and glaring security issues.